Skip to main content

State v. Williams

Citations

  • 285 N.W.2d 248
  • 1979 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1043

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • following the reversal of conviction by the United States Supreme Court in Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387, 97 S.Ct. 1232, 51 L.Ed.2d 424 [1977]
  • “[T]he right to choice of counsel by both indigent and non-indigent defendants is limited.... ”
  • “[T]he right to choice of counsel by both indigent and non-indigent defendants is limited . . . .”
  • “[T]he right to choice of counsel by both indigent and non-indigent defendants is limited . . . .”
  • “[T]rial court is vested with broad, but not unlimited, discretion in ruling upon a challenge for cause.”
  • “[T]he right to choice of counsel by both indigent and non-indigent defendants is limited by trial court discretion to maintain an orderly trial process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Legrand, Rees, Harris, Allbee, McGive-rin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

76 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

136 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.