Supreme Court of Iowa· 11/14/1979
State v. Williams
Citations
- 285 N.W.2d 248
- 1979 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1043
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- following the reversal of conviction by the United States Supreme Court in Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387, 97 S.Ct. 1232, 51 L.Ed.2d 424 [1977]
- “[T]he right to choice of counsel by both indigent and non-indigent defendants is limited.... ”
- “[T]he right to choice of counsel by both indigent and non-indigent defendants is limited . . . .”
- “[T]he right to choice of counsel by both indigent and non-indigent defendants is limited . . . .”
- “[T]rial court is vested with broad, but not unlimited, discretion in ruling upon a challenge for cause.”
- “[T]he right to choice of counsel by both indigent and non-indigent defendants is limited by trial court discretion to maintain an orderly trial process.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Legrand, Rees, Harris, Allbee, McGive-rin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
76 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,080×
- State v. HeemstraSupreme Court of Iowa· 2006-08-25· cited 168×
- State v. SugarSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1985-07-24· cited 143×
- State v. AultArizona Supreme Court· 1986-09-18· cited 110×
- State v. AldapeSupreme Court of Iowa· 1981-06-17· cited 108×
- State v. SchoelermanSupreme Court of Iowa· 1982-01-20· cited 106×
- State v. BroadnaxWashington Supreme Court· 1982-12-02· cited 106×
- Fryer v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa· 1982-10-27· cited 105×
- State v. HollyNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2013-06-19· cited 101×
- People v. StithNew York Court of Appeals· 1987-03-26· cited 101×
- Smith v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1997-11-21· cited 96×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1982-04-21· cited 91×
- State v. TejedaSupreme Court of Iowa· 2004-04-07· cited 87×
- State v. DuncanSupreme Court of Iowa· 1981-11-25· cited 84×
- Douglas Beery v. John AultEighth Circuit· 2003-01-29· cited 74×
- Schrier v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa· 1984-04-11· cited 70×
- State v. LucasSupreme Court of Iowa· 1982-08-25· cited 68×
- Coleman v. StateMontana Supreme Court· 1981-08-28· cited 67×
- Bouwkamp v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1992-06-02· cited 67×
- United States v. KozakUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1982-03-08· cited 66×
Cites
136 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1975-06-26· cited 4,589×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-02-02· cited 3,856×
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court· 1975-06-09· cited 3,396×
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 3,002×
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 2,653×
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1977-05-16· cited 2,626×
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-03-24· cited 2,470×
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1920-03-01· cited 2,373×
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-01-11· cited 2,073×
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court· 1972-01-12· cited 1,930×
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1939-12-11· cited 1,927×
- Michigan v. TuckerSupreme Court· 1974-06-10· cited 1,437×
- Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1972-05-22· cited 1,080×
- Alexander v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1972-04-03· cited 889×
- Apodaca v. OregonSupreme Court· 1972-05-22· cited 853×
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-12-23· cited 762×
- United States v. CeccoliniSupreme Court· 1978-12-05· cited 702×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.