Supreme Court of New Jersey· 7/24/1985

State v. Sugar

Citations

495 A.2d 90
100 N.J. 214
1985 N.J. LEXIS 2367

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

applying “clear and convincing evidence” standard as burden of proof with respect to “inevitable discovery” discovery claim
explaining how independent source doctrine allows admission of evidence “ ‘that has been discovered by means wholly independent of any constitutional violation’ ”
explaining how independent source doctrine allows admission of evidence \ `that has been discovered by means wholly independent of any constitutional violation' \
applying “clear-and-convincing-evidence” standard as elevated burden of proof with respect to claim of “inevitable discovery” of illegally obtained evidence, because State had “created [the] situation”
creating the New Jersey inevitable discovery rules: “(1) [P]roper, normal and specific investigatory procedures would have been pursued in order to complete the investigation of the case; (2
holding, inter alia, consent to must be \unequivocal\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Handler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

80 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Sugar

8 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.