Smith v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing under Alaska Constitution art. I, § 22 but limiting application “where the police have intentionally or knowingly violated a suspect’s rights.”
• recognizing the inevitable discovery rule but limiting its application under the Alaska Constitution “where the police have intentionally or knowingly violated a suspect’s rights”
• \It is well settled that the exclusionary rule renders inadmissible evidence obtained indirectly as a result of an unlawful search or seizure as well as evidence directly obtained thereby.\ (citing Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 83 S.Ct. 407, 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Holly
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2013-06-19· cited 101×
• McBath v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2005-02-18· cited 24×
• Wardlow v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2000-06-02· cited 16×
• State v. GILBERTO L.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-06-23· cited 15×
• Lloyd's & Institute of London Underwriting Companies v. Fulton
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2000-05-12· cited 12×
• Snyder v. State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor Vehicles
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2001-09-28· cited 5×
• Erickson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2008-04-25· cited 5×
• Starkey v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2012-03-09· cited 2×
• Winfrey v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2003-10-16· cited 2×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1999-12-03· cited 1×
• Anderson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2004-05-28· cited 1×
• People v. d'Estree
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2024-10-03· cited 1×
• LLOYD'S & INST. OF LONDON v. Fulton
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2000-05-12
• Garnett v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2023-10-24

Cites

67 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Wong Sun v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
• Nix v. Williams
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,080×
• State v. Miller
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1985-11-05· cited 162×
• People v. Breidenbach
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1994-06-13· cited 162×
• People v. Fitzpatrick
  New York Court of Appeals· 1973-06-07· cited 158×
• State v. Sugar
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1985-07-24· cited 143×
• Oken v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-09-17· cited 141×
• Wilson v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1994-04-18· cited 132×
• Erickson v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1973-03-05· cited 129×
• McGregor v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1994-12-06· cited 119×
• Green v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1985-10-21· cited 112×
• United States v. Merle Ellis Owens
  Tenth Circuit· 1986-01-22· cited 110×
• State v. Ault
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1986-09-18· cited 110×
• State v. Lopez
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1995-05-16· cited 110×
• Walls v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1986-08-05· cited 106×
• Strickland v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1995-10-02· cited 104×
• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1979-11-14· cited 100×
• State v. Andersen
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1989-05-19· cited 99×
• Commonwealth v. O'CONNOR
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1989-11-20· cited 97×