State Ex Rel. Rasmussen v. Tahash

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that state has obligation to show that circumstances under which evidence was obtained was consistent with constitutional requirements
• noting that “[i]n order for constitutional challenges to the admission of evidence to be timely, objections to such evidence must be raised at the omnibus hearing” in the form of a pretrial motion to suppress
• defining plain error as any error where failure to reverse would “perpetuate a substantial and essential injustice in the sense that as a result an innocent man may have been convicted”
• setting forth procedures to be followed in resolving pretrial suppression issues
• setting forth procedures to be followed in resolving pretrial suppression issues
• defendant waived right to object to introduction of confession by not requesting hearing on voluntariness of confession

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).