Supreme Court of South Carolina· 12/16/1991
State v. Wilder
Citations
- 413 S.E.2d 323
- 306 S.C. 535
- 1991 S.C. LEXIS 263
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that counsel may strike a juror based on demeanor and disposition
- holding a party may strike a potential juror \based on their demeanor and disposition\
- noting a proper strike may be based on \demeanor and disposition.\
- solicitor’s explanation that two blacks were struck from the jury because they reported late for jury duty established that strikes were racially neutral
- no Batson violation where solicitor excused two black jurors because they were late but sat a white juror who was also late, because the white juror expressed a desire to serve on the jury
- no Batson violation where solicitor excused two black jurors because they were late but sat a white juror who was also late, because the white juror expressed a desire to serve on the jury
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chandler, Gregory, Harwell, Finney, Toal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-09-03· cited 98×
- State v. TuckerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-01-25· cited 45×
- State v. RayfieldSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-05-30· cited 38×
- State v. RegisterSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-08-12· cited 33×
- State v. CochranCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-05-30· cited 25×
- State v. EaslerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-05-13· cited 23×
- State v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-11-25· cited 23×
- State v. McCraySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-09-28· cited 18×
- State v. GarrisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-08-10· cited 18×
- State v. CaseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-01-13· cited 16×
- State v. SmallsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-06-28· cited 12×
- State v. GillCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-07-17· cited 10×
- State v. RayfieldCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-01-27· cited 9×
- State v. WattsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-11-13· cited 8×
- State v. GeddisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-08-09· cited 8×
- State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-06-21· cited 7×
- State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2015-07-15· cited 1×
- State v. Benjamin Jerome BlakeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2024-01-03
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1991-05-28· cited 4,168×
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1991-06-13· cited 1,818×
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-10-07· cited 28×
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-05-28· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.