Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Supreme Court of South Carolina· 9/3/1996

State v. George

Citations

  • 476 S.E.2d 903
  • 323 S.C. 496
  • 1996 S.C. LEXIS 157

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing appellant’s possible drug dealing was merely suggested and no testimony was presented concerning such behavior
  • holding that an issue is not preserved for review if the objecting party accepts the judge's ruling and does not contemporaneously make an additional objection to the sufficiency of the curative instruction or move for a mistrial
  • recognizing appellant’s possible drug dealing was merely suggested and no testimony was presented concerning such behavior
  • finding that the trial court acted correctly by disqualifying a juror that “declared that she did not think she could sign a form recommending the death penalty”
  • holding appellant’s failure to object to the sufficiency of the curative instruction or move for a mistrial following the curative instruction rendered the issue unpreserved for appeal
  • holding no issue is preserved for appellate review if objecting party accepts judge’s ruling and does not contemporaneously make addition al objection to sufficiency of curative charge or move for mistrial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burnett, Finney, Toal, Moore, Waller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.