Supreme Court of South Carolina· 10/7/1991
State v. Green
Citations
- 409 S.E.2d 785
- 306 S.C. 94
- 1991 S.C. LEXIS 209
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the proponent of the peremptory challenges at issue must present an explanation that is racially neutral, clear, reasonably specific, legitimate and related to the case
- absent showing that solicitor intentionally exercised strike because of discriminatory reasons, trial judge’s findings that strike was not racially motivated should be given great deference on appeal
- absent showing that solicitor intentionally exercised strike because of racial concerns or for a discriminatory purpose, the trial judge’s finding that strike was not racially motivated should be given great deference on appeal
- unemployment may be race-neutral reason for a strike
- unemployment may be race-neutral reason for a strike
- unemployment may be race-neutral reason for a strike
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gregory, Harwell, Chandler, Toal, Finney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-04-29· cited 113×
- State v. HicksSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-04-27· cited 60×
- State v. HaiglerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-03-22· cited 48×
- Riddle v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-05-09· cited 37×
- Sumpter v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-01-10· cited 26×
- State v. WilderSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-12-16· cited 25×
- State v. CochranCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-05-30· cited 25×
- State v. FordSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-02-08· cited 25×
- State v. EaslerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-05-13· cited 23×
- State v. CaseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-01-13· cited 16×
- Payton v. KearseCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-07-17· cited 11×
- State v. GillCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-07-17· cited 10×
- State v. WattsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-11-13· cited 8×
- State v. GeddisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-08-09· cited 8×
- State v. GuessCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-04-03· cited 8×
- State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-06-21· cited 7×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-02-20· cited 4×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1991-05-28· cited 4,168×
- Ross v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1988-08-25· cited 1,289×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-07-20· cited 73×
- State v. OglesbySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-05-15· cited 51×
- Christiansen v. CommissionerSupreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 43×
- State v. TomlinSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-09-05· cited 40×
- State v. MartinezSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-11-30· cited 32×
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-02-29· cited 26×
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-08-10· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.