Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 11/25/1996
State v. Kennedy
Citations
- 479 S.E.2d 838
- 325 S.C. 295
- 1996 S.C. App. LEXIS 171
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding an oral admission not in response to any interrogation is voluntary
- stating interrogation “includes words or actions on the part of police (other than those normally attendant to arrest and custody) that the police should know are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Cureton, Goolsby
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SaylorTennessee Supreme Court· 2003-09-30· cited 214×
- State v. CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-04-05· cited 157×
- State v. ReedSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-07-27· cited 63×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-10-19· cited 59×
- State v. SantiagoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-06-19· cited 49×
- State v. KirtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-12-17· cited 32×
- State v. KennedySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-12-29· cited 31×
- State v. BreezeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-07-23· cited 19×
- State v. LynchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-11-27· cited 13×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-07-24· cited 10×
- State v. MedleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-06-15· cited 6×
- State v. DyeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-06-04· cited 5×
- State v. HookCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-12-17· cited 5×
- State v. HoyleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-04-04· cited 5×
- State v. Phillip Wayne LoweryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2022-04-06
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court· 1986-03-10· cited 3,339×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 2,777×
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1977-05-16· cited 2,626×
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court· 1975-12-09· cited 2,561×
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-12-12· cited 2,107×
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court· 1972-01-12· cited 1,930×
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1991-06-13· cited 1,818×
- Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court· 1986-04-01· cited 1,418×
- Oregon v. BradshawSupreme Court· 1983-06-23· cited 1,351×
- Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1984-12-10· cited 1,225×
- Michigan v. HarveySupreme Court· 1990-04-30· cited 701×
- Duckworth v. EaganSupreme Court· 1989-06-26· cited 652×
- Arizona v. MauroSupreme Court· 1987-06-26· cited 418×
- State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-05-20· cited 352×
- Friedberg v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Supreme Court· 1977-10-11· cited 226×
- State v. RochesterSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-04-02· cited 90×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.