Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/24/2023
State v. Whitten
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 973
Syllabus
The trial court's denial of the motion to suppress is affirmed. The totality of the circumstances and competent credible evidence supports the trial court's findings and conclusions that appellant was not in custody while being detained after a traffic stop.
Judges: Osowik
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court· 2006-05-22· cited 2,237×
- New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court· 1984-06-12· cited 1,468×
- Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court· 1990-06-14· cited 1,275×
- State v. RobinetteOhio Supreme Court· 1997-11-12· cited 619×
- State v. MooreOhio Supreme Court· 2000-09-20· cited 370×
- State v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court· 2014-03-20· cited 335×
- State v. FerrellCourt of Appeals of Ohio, Eleventh District, Portage County· 2017-12-29· cited 14×
- State v. GregoryOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-03· cited 7×
- State v. CrossOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-04-11· cited 4×
- State v. ReynoldsOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-30· cited 2×
- State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-05-22· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.