Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 9/20/2000

State v. Moore

Citations

  • 90 Ohio St. 3d 47
  • 734 N.E.2d 804

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that Moore does not require “‘additional factors to corroborate the suspicion of the presence of marijuana’”
  • the smell of marijuana by a person qualified to recognize the odor is sufficient to establish probable cause to search a motor vehicle
  • and then evaluating the general exigency exception in regards to the search of the defendant’s person
  • an officer with probable cause to believe a person has drugs during a traffic stop need not leave the drugs in the person’s pocket while a warrant is obtained under the exigency exception
  • “[t]he odor of marijuana was a reasonable ground for Sergeant Greene to believe that defendant was guilty of a drug-related criminal offense,” and, “[t]herefore, … Sergeant Greene had sufficient probable cause to conduct a search”
  • but finding the particular circumstance alone met the test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

241 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.