Ohio Supreme Court· 9/20/2000
State v. Moore
Citations
- 90 Ohio St. 3d 47
- 734 N.E.2d 804
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that Moore does not require “‘additional factors to corroborate the suspicion of the presence of marijuana’”
- the smell of marijuana by a person qualified to recognize the odor is sufficient to establish probable cause to search a motor vehicle
- and then evaluating the general exigency exception in regards to the search of the defendant’s person
- an officer with probable cause to believe a person has drugs during a traffic stop need not leave the drugs in the person’s pocket while a warrant is obtained under the exigency exception
- “[t]he odor of marijuana was a reasonable ground for Sergeant Greene to believe that defendant was guilty of a drug-related criminal offense,” and, “[t]herefore, … Sergeant Greene had sufficient probable cause to conduct a search”
- but finding the particular circumstance alone met the test
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
241 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. FarrisOhio Supreme Court· 2006-07-12· cited 172×
- Commonwealth v. WashingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2007-07-17· cited 85×
- State v. MooreOhio Supreme Court· 2000-09-20· cited 84×
- Robey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 2013-06-27· cited 69×
- State v. DurhamOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-10-28· cited 68×
- State v. PhillipsOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-20· cited 50×
- Commonwealth v. GardenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2008-04-01· cited 44×
- State v. HawkinsIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-04-23· cited 41×
- State v. GartrellOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-24· cited 38×
- Bunch v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2008-04-08· cited 33×
- State v. Vega (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-10-03· cited 31×
- Wilson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-07-11· cited 25×
- State v. ThomasOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-12-03· cited 25×
- State v. ScottOhio Supreme Court· 2001-05-11· cited 25×
- State v. McClellanOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-02-01· cited 24×
- State v. DavenportOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-24· cited 24×
- State v. KnoxOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-04-25· cited 23×
- State v. LynnOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-08-20· cited 17×
- State v. KelleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-07-14· cited 16×
- State v. HarshOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-01-27· cited 16×
Cites
53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-05-15· cited 7,105×
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 6,013×
- United States v. RossSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,985×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-02-02· cited 3,856×
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 3,445×
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-06-10· cited 3,146×
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 2,669×
- Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1984-05-15· cited 1,874×
- McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-12-20· cited 1,736×
- State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court· 1992-01-08· cited 1,624×
- Cupp v. MurphySupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 739×
- Maryland v. DysonSupreme Court· 1999-06-21· cited 695×
- City of Maumee v. WeisnerOhio Supreme Court· 1999-12-22· cited 485×
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1932-05-02· cited 405×
- People v. KazmierczakMichigan Supreme Court· 2000-02-10· cited 230×
- United States v. James Fields Christopher CrawleySecond Circuit· 1997-05-12· cited 184×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.