Skip to main content

State v. King

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 3065

Syllabus

Appellant's motion to suppress was properly denied, where the OVI checkpoint at which appellant was stopped was executed in a manner consistent with the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Appellant's trafficking and possession convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence, and the trial court properly imposed the mandatory costs of prosecution.

Judges: Zmuda

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.