State v. King
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 3065
Syllabus
Appellant's motion to suppress was properly denied, where the OVI checkpoint at which appellant was stopped was executed in a manner consistent with the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Appellant's trafficking and possession convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence, and the trial court properly imposed the mandatory costs of prosecution.
Judges: Zmuda
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1982-06-07· cited 3,796×
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court· 1979-06-25· cited 2,679×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court· 1990-06-14· cited 1,275×
- State v. LangOhio Supreme Court· 2011-08-31· cited 509×
- State v. DowneyTennessee Supreme Court· 1997-05-12· cited 198×
- State v. HilleshiemSupreme Court of Iowa· 1980-04-23· cited 67×
- State v. CollinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-14· cited 45×
- State v. FarlessOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-04-15· cited 28×
- State v. WymerOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-26· cited 26×
- State v. GrayOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-12-04· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.