· 6/9/1981
United States v. Edward J. Robinson
Citations
- 651 F.2d 1188
- 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 12486
- 8 Fed. R. Serv. 853
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A] duplicitous or multiplicitous indictment is remediable by the court’s instruction to the jury particularizing the distinct offense charged in each count in the indictment.”
- “[A] duplicitous or multiplicitous indictment is remediable by the court’s instruction to the jury particularizing the distinct offense charged in each count in the indictment.”
- \[A] duplicitous or multiplicitous indictment is remediable by the court's instruction to the jury particularizing the distinct offense charged in each count in the indictment.\
- “The rules about multiplicity and duplicity are pleading rules, the violation of which is not fatal to an indictment.”
- No fifth amendment violation found where prosecutor remarked upon defense counsel's inability to impeach a key witness' testimony despite extensive cross-examination
- “The rules about multiplicity and duplicity are pleading rules, the violation of which is not fatal to an indictment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Engel, Jones, Cecil
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.