Skip to main content
· 6/9/1981

United States v. Edward J. Robinson

Citations

  • 651 F.2d 1188
  • 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 12486
  • 8 Fed. R. Serv. 853

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] duplicitous or multiplicitous indictment is remediable by the court’s instruction to the jury particularizing the distinct offense charged in each count in the indictment.”
  • “[A] duplicitous or multiplicitous indictment is remediable by the court’s instruction to the jury particularizing the distinct offense charged in each count in the indictment.”
  • \[A] duplicitous or multiplicitous indictment is remediable by the court's instruction to the jury particularizing the distinct offense charged in each count in the indictment.\
  • “The rules about multiplicity and duplicity are pleading rules, the violation of which is not fatal to an indictment.”
  • No fifth amendment violation found where prosecutor remarked upon defense counsel's inability to impeach a key witness' testimony despite extensive cross-examination
  • “The rules about multiplicity and duplicity are pleading rules, the violation of which is not fatal to an indictment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Engel, Jones, Cecil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.