State of Arizona v. Manuel Alejandro Delgado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding testimony under Rule 702 by physician as “strangulation expert” based on medical training and experience
• noting the 2012 amendment to Rule 702 was not intended to preclude experience-based expert testimony
• whether an expert’s patients have accurately reported the cause of their injuries goes to the weight of the expert’s testimony, not its admissibility
• “If an expert meets the liberal minimum qualifications, her level of expertise goes to credibility and weight, not admissibility.”
• “Whether a witness is qualified as an expert is to be construed liberally,” and “[i]f an expert meets the liberal minimum qualifications, her level of expertise goes to credibility and weight, not admissibility.”
• qualifications of expert witness are “construed liberally”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).