Skip to main content

State v. White

Citations

  • 551 P.2d 1344
  • 97 Idaho 708
  • 1976 Ida. LEXIS 343

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that prejudicial remarks are those that constitute a comment on the weight of the evidence
  • holding that a judge must not “comment on the weight of the evidence” or express an “opinion as to the evidence . . . relat[ing] to a critical issue in the case” (citations omitted)
  • holding it constituted fundamental error for the prosecutor to elicit testimony about the defendant’s post-arrest silence, whether his purpose was to raise an inference of guilt or to impeach the defendant’s trial testimony
  • the exception to the general rule is that this Court will review \fundamental error\ on appeal even when no adequate objection has been interposed at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFadden, Donaldson, Bakes, Bistline, Jtj, Shepard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.