Idaho Supreme Court· 7/7/1976
State v. White
Citations
- 551 P.2d 1344
- 97 Idaho 708
- 1976 Ida. LEXIS 343
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that prejudicial remarks are those that constitute a comment on the weight of the evidence
- holding that a judge must not “comment on the weight of the evidence” or express an “opinion as to the evidence . . . relat[ing] to a critical issue in the case” (citations omitted)
- holding it constituted fundamental error for the prosecutor to elicit testimony about the defendant’s post-arrest silence, whether his purpose was to raise an inference of guilt or to impeach the defendant’s trial testimony
- the exception to the general rule is that this Court will review \fundamental error\ on appeal even when no adequate objection has been interposed at trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McFadden, Donaldson, Bakes, Bistline, Jtj, Shepard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. YakovacIdaho Supreme Court· 2008-02-13· cited 193×
- State v. OsbornIdaho Supreme Court· 1981-07-09· cited 167×
- State v. PizzutoIdaho Supreme Court· 1991-01-15· cited 162×
- State v. UrquhartIdaho Court of Appeals· 1983-06-28· cited 135×
- State v. LePageIdaho Supreme Court· 1981-06-25· cited 123×
- State v. LavyIdaho Supreme Court· 1992-03-26· cited 123×
- State v. ReynoldsIdaho Court of Appeals· 1991-08-02· cited 105×
- State v. SharpIdaho Supreme Court· 1980-09-03· cited 102×
- State v. IwakiriIdaho Supreme Court· 1984-05-07· cited 90×
- State v. BeamIdaho Supreme Court· 1985-10-24· cited 85×
- Westmark v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1984-12-27· cited 71×
- State v. MauroIdaho Supreme Court· 1991-12-31· cited 67×
- State v. ChristiansenIdaho Supreme Court· 2007-05-02· cited 63×
- State v. LovelaceIdaho Supreme Court· 2003-11-20· cited 62×
- State v. CarterIdaho Supreme Court· 1982-12-20· cited 60×
- State v. Russell James ParkerIdaho Supreme Court· 2014-08-06· cited 57×
- Clenin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1978-01-12· cited 56×
- State v. MajorIdaho Supreme Court· 1983-06-17· cited 56×
- State v. Preston Adam JoyIdaho Supreme Court· 2013-06-25· cited 53×
- State v. LankfordIdaho Supreme Court· 1987-07-29· cited 52×
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 4,773×
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-04-28· cited 4,680×
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,088×
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1976-06-21· cited 2,305×
- Greene v. McElroySupreme Court· 1959-06-29· cited 1,385×
- State v. HaggardIdaho Supreme Court· 1971-06-24· cited 202×
- People v. BoboMichigan Supreme Court· 1973-11-21· cited 164×
- Raymond R. Fowle v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1969-04-14· cited 104×
- State v. AndersonArizona Supreme Court· 1973-12-20· cited 71×
- United States v. Saul SemensohnSecond Circuit· 1970-02-06· cited 66×
- Matthew Johnson v. Wayne K. Patterson, Warden, Colorado State PenitentiaryTenth Circuit· 1973-03-22· cited 65×
- State v. DunnIdaho Supreme Court· 1967-11-21· cited 60×
- Gabrielson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 54×
- State v. PolsonIdaho Supreme Court· 1959-04-22· cited 49×
- State v. DeLawderCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-09-23· cited 45×
- United States v. Flemming Anderson, United States of America v. William G. HaleD.C. Circuit· 1974-08-01· cited 42×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.