Skip to main content
Idaho Supreme Court· 11/20/2003

State v. Lovelace

Citations

  • 90 P.3d 278
  • 140 Idaho 53

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that no evidentiary value is given to mere conclusory allegations that are unsupported by admissible evidence
  • rejecting argument that a defense attorney elected to a prosecutorial position would not want to appear “soft on crime” and was conflicted
  • ‘‘[a] defendant’s request for expert or investigative services should be reviewed in light of all circum- stances and be measured against the standard of ‘fundamental fairness’ embodied in the due process clause’’ [emphasis added]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walters, Trout, Schroeder, Kidwell, Eismann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

83 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Lovelace

18 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.