State v. Wiese

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concurrent 25-year terms for sodomy and rape not disproportionate to offenses and not cruel and unusual
• “[A]nalysis of the three [Rodriguez/Buck] factors under Article I, section 16, provide a sufficient basis to decide whether [a] defen- dant’s sentence was * * * cruel and unusual under the Eighth Amendment.”
• “[A]nalysis of the three [Rodriguez/Buck] factors under Article I, section 16, provide a sufficient basis to decide whether [a] defen- dant’s sentence was * * * cruel and unusual under the Eighth Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Woodard
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2012-07-13· cited 45×
• State v. Parker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-11-27· cited 28×
• State v. McCombs
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-02-07· cited 18×
• State v. Hurtado
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-10-23· cited 10×
• State v. Thomas
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-07-11· cited 6×
• State v. Hernandez-Esteban
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-01-04· cited 5×
• State v. Kropf
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-03-26· cited 2×
• State v. Lancaster
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-11-26· cited 2×
• State v. McCoombs
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-02-07

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Rodriguez/Buck
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-09-24· cited 151×
• State v. Thompson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1999-02-04· cited 139×
• State v. Wheeler
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2007-12-28· cited 59×
• State v. Alwinger
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-07-14· cited 26×