Skip to main content

State v. Le

Citations

  • 327 Or. App. 129
  • 534 P.3d 1097

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing the defendant’s claims of unconstitutional disproportionality under Article I, section 16, but determining that he had not preserved his claims under the Eighth Amendment, as those claims were raised for the first time on appeal
  • when a trial court’s deci- sion “falls within the range of legally permissible choices” and produces a permissible, legally correct outcome, then the trial court did not abuse its discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ortega

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.