Utah Supreme Court· 12/30/1993

State v. Wetzel

Citations

868 P.2d 64
229 Utah Adv. Rep. 8
1993 Utah LEXIS 162
1993 WL 544872

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that even if error was made, reversal is not warranted absent a showing of prejudice
holding in absence of record of how defendant used peremptory challenges to remove jurors challenged on appeal, appellate court assumed regularity of proceedings below
holding in absence of record of how defendant used peremptory challenges to remove jurors challenged on appeal, appellate court assumed regularity of proceedings below
stating that testimony, while not beneficial to defendant, was not so prejudicial as to impair substantial right, and trial court obviated any error when it struck testimony and ordered jury to disregard it
stating that testimony, while not beneficial to defendant, was not so prejudicial as to impair substantial right, and trial court obviated any error when it struck testimony and ordered jury to disregard it
explaining that in absence of record of how defendant used peremptory challenges to remove jurors challenged on appeal, the appellate court “can only assume the regularity of the proceedings below”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Hall, Howe, Durham, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.