Utah Supreme Court· 12/20/1995
State v. Smith
Citations
- 909 P.2d 236
- 280 Utah Adv. Rep. 6
- 1995 Utah LEXIS 87
- 1995 WL 755117
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a present sense impression exception requires the statement to be “strictly contemporaneous” with the event
- holding that a present sense impression exception requires the statement to be “strictly contemporaneous” with the event
- holding that victim’s statements to a child abuse investigator within three hours of assault were admissible where victim was bleeding, in pain, and in a “dissociative state” of “psychic shock”
- noting that victim of a sexual assault suffered substantial bodily injury when she was still bleeding two hours after the assault occurred and required surgery
- noting that rule 803(1)'s \'present sense impression'\ exception requires statements to be \strictly contemporaneous\ with the event or condition described
- noting that child rape victim suffered substantial bodily injury when girl was bleeding from assault two hours after it occurred and was required to undergo an hour-long surgery to repair her injuries
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stewart, Howe, Durham, Stewart'S, Zimmerman, Russon, Howe'S
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. MontoyaUtah Supreme Court· 2004-01-23· cited 75×
- State v. CrosbyUtah Supreme Court· 1996-10-29· cited 69×
- State v. GalliUtah Supreme Court· 1998-06-16· cited 64×
- State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2014-01-09· cited 44×
- Leonard Reed v. John Thalacker, Warden, and State of IowaEighth Circuit· 1999-12-30· cited 38×
- State v. LebeauUtah Supreme Court· 2014-09-19· cited 32×
- Myers v. StateUtah Supreme Court· 2004-04-20· cited 30×
- State v. VigilCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1996-07-05· cited 23×
- Wickham v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court· 2002-07-26· cited 21×
- State v. MadiganSupreme Court of Vermont· 2015-04-17· cited 17×
- State v. SchweitzerCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1997-07-31· cited 15×
- State v. LebeauCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2012-08-23· cited 11×
- State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2012-10-12· cited 10×
- State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2016-04-28· cited 10×
- State v. GaileyCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2015-10-01· cited 9×
- State v. ValdezCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2008-09-11· cited 8×
- State v. NeilsonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2017-01-12· cited 8×
- State v. FahinaCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2017-07-07· cited 7×
- State v. FairchildCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2016-09-29· cited 6×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2020-04-23· cited 5×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1992-01-15· cited 1,508×
- State v. TemplinUtah Supreme Court· 1990-12-07· cited 158×
- State v. BrownUtah Supreme Court· 1992-11-30· cited 112×
- Johnston v. OhlsWashington Supreme Court· 1969-07-17· cited 89×
- United States v. Darrell Levan MosesEighth Circuit· 1994-02-04· cited 49×
- Kofford Ex Rel. Utah State Department of Social Services v. FloraUtah Supreme Court· 1987-09-30· cited 42×
- State v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court· 1989-06-28· cited 41×
- State v. WetzelUtah Supreme Court· 1993-12-30· cited 40×
- State v. StrunkUtah Supreme Court· 1993-01-27· cited 34×
- State v. CudeUtah Supreme Court· 1989-12-29· cited 23×
- State v. KaytsoUtah Supreme Court· 1984-06-29· cited 15×
- Birch Ranch & Oil Co. v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1941-03-24· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.