Skip to main content

State v. Cobb

Citations

  • 774 P.2d 1123
  • 107 Utah Adv. Rep. 43
  • 1989 Utah LEXIS 35
  • 1989 WL 46871

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “fact that the same evidence could have been provided by purely testimonial means does not necessarily make a photograph inadmissible”
  • holding that an autopsy picture taken after the victim’s chest had been opened was not admitted in violation of rule 403 where the picture “[wa]s relatively clear of blood”
  • holding that the district court properly admitted autopsy photos to refute the “defendant’s accidental death theory and illustrate the probable position of [the] defendant in relation to the victim at the time of the shooting”
  • holding photo of corpse not gruesome where body had been washed and wounds sutured, photo was dull, and victim’s head was not shown
  • affirming trial court’s refusal to dismiss, for cause, a juror that had served as a police officer
  • finding photo not gruesome because photograph was dull in color, body had been washed and sutured, only area between thigh and chest where two wounds were inflicted was exposed, and victim’s head and face were not shown

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Howe, Durham, Zimmerman, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.