Skip to main content
· 1/13/1986

State v. Barella

Citations

  • 714 P.2d 287
  • 26 Utah Adv. Rep. 11
  • 1986 Utah LEXIS 721

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defense counsel was required to timely object to any limitation counsel believed the trial court had imposed in the cross-examination of a witness
  • defense counsel was required to timely object to any limitation counsel believed the trial court had imposed in the cross-examination of a witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howe, Hall, Stewart, Durham, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.