Skip to main content

State v. West

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 640
  • 106 N.E.3d 96

Syllabus

Trial court did not violate a defendant's due process and equal protection rights in imposing a six-year prison term on the defendant where the record reflects that the defendant's inability to repay $2.2 million to victims in the two-year time period between the guilty plea being entered and sentence being imposed was not a sentencing consideration by the trial court. Further, the defendant failed to establish that an actual conflict of interest existed by defense counsel's joint representation of the defendant and another co-defendant who were both involved in the sale of an unregistered security and the fraudulent act or practice in the sale of securities.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • counsel’s decision at sentencing not to focus on one defendant’s lesser culpability was not “indicative of an actual conflict of interest” where a different strategy was more viable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hendrickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.