State v. Rose

Citations

• 2022 Ohio 2454

Syllabus

The adequacy of the data relied upon by the expert who examined appellant's competency and sanity was a question for the trier of fact. There was reliable, credible evidence demonstrating appellant was competent to stand trial and that at the time she committed the underlying arson offense, she was not suffering from a severe mental disease or defect and knew the wrongfulness of her conduct. The Reagan Tokes Law is not unconstitutionally void for vagueness and does not run afoul of appellant's due process rights or rights to a jury trial.