Supreme Court· 3/2/1971

Tate v. Short

Citations

401 U.S. 395
91 S. Ct. 668
28 L. Ed. 2d 130
1971 U.S. LEXIS 74

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that petitioner who was held on municipal prison farm because he was unable to pay fines on convictions for traffic offenses violated equal protection rights
holding that a state cannot convert a fine into a jail term solely because the defendant is indigent and cannot immediately pay the fine in full
finding that imprisoning those unable to pay traffic fines “is imposed to augment the State’s revenues but obviously does not serv that purpose”
finding that imprisoning drivers too poor to pay traffic fines, while ostensibly “imposed to augment the State’s revenues,” “obviously” impedes that purpose rather than serving it
invalidating a facially neutral statute that authorized imprisonment for failure to pay fines because it violated the equal protection rights of indigents
extending Williams to prohibit \jailing an indigent for failing to make immediate payment of any fine\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brennan, Burger, Douglas, Stewart, White, Marshall, Blacicmun, Blackmun, Black, Harlan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

602 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Tate v. Short

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.