Supreme Court· 6/29/1970
Williams v. Illinois
Citations
- 399 U.S. 235
- 90 S. Ct. 2018
- 26 L. Ed. 2d 586
- 1970 U.S. LEXIS 8
- 52 Ohio Op. 2d 281
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that there is no requirement that persons convicted of the same offense receive identical sentences
- holding that an individual may not be held in continued confinement beyond the statutory maximum because of his failure to pay a fine
- holding that state may not subject indigent defendants to period of imprisonment beyond statutory maximum
- holding that states “may not constitutionally imprison beyond the maximum duration fixed by statute a defendant who is financially unable to pay a fine”
- holding that an individual may not be held in contin- ued confinement beyond the statutory maximum because of his failure to pay a fine
- holding that states “may not constitutionally imprison beyond the maximum duration fixed by statute a defendant who is financially unable to pay a fine”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burger, Harlan, Blackmun
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
710 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court· 1979-05-14· cited 11,438×
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1973-04-23· cited 3,699×
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1983-05-24· cited 1,941×
- Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 1,454×
- Mickens v. TaylorSupreme Court· 2002-03-27· cited 1,451×
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court· 1991-03-04· cited 1,406×
- Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1992-05-18· cited 1,348×
- Zablocki v. RedhailSupreme Court· 1978-01-18· cited 1,224×
- Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 1,161×
- Lloyd D. Alkire v. Judge Jane IrvingSixth Circuit· 2003-06-02· cited 1,134×
- Commonwealth v. Muniz, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-07-19· cited 899×
- M. L. B. v. S. L. J.Supreme Court· 1996-12-16· cited 896×
- Tate v. ShortSupreme Court· 1971-03-02· cited 837×
- Schall v. MartinSupreme Court· 1984-06-04· cited 785×
- United States v. MacCollomSupreme Court· 1976-06-10· cited 635×
- Black v. RomanoSupreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 620×
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court· 1971-08-30· cited 593×
- Lubin v. PanishSupreme Court· 1974-03-26· cited 530×
- United States v. MandujanoSupreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 525×
- Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court· 1974-05-20· cited 365×
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 10,395×
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 8,442×
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court· 1964-10-12· cited 3,703×
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court· 1968-05-27· cited 3,604×
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-04-29· cited 3,330×
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court· 1970-04-06· cited 3,248×
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1969-04-21· cited 3,119×
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1949-06-06· cited 2,766×
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court· 1958-06-30· cited 2,614×
- Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court· 1942-06-01· cited 1,929×
- Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court· 1968-10-15· cited 1,576×
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court· 1960-06-20· cited 1,508×
- Walz v. Tax Comm'n of City of New YorkSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 1,430×
- Harper v. Virginia Board of ElectionsSupreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 1,402×
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 1,401×
- Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court· 1938-03-28· cited 1,301×
- Poe v. UllmanSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 1,202×
- Welsh v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1970-06-15· cited 785×
- Rinaldi v. YeagerSupreme Court· 1966-05-31· cited 700×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.