Skip to main content
· 6/11/2018

State v. Laghaoui

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 2261
  • 114 N.E.3d 249

Syllabus

The trial court did not err by finding appellant competent to stand trial where appellant failed to meet his burden of proof establishing his incompetence by a preponderance of the evidence. The trial court also did not err by instructing the jury on intoxication where appellant's intoxication was raised as part of his not guilty by reason of insanity defense, nor did the trial court err by excluding testimony from appellant's intended expert witness where the proffered testimony was an unreliable, untested assumption that was inadmissible pursuant to Evid.R. 702.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • The Court of International Trade lacked “colorable jurisdiction to review the merits” of an agency decision and thus its decision did “not have preclusive effect under section 1500”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: S. Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.