Ohio Court of Appeals· 2/18/2022

State v. Wendling

Citations

2022 Ohio 496

Syllabus

Appellant was convicted by a jury of solicitation and loitering to engage in solicitation. The convictions were supported by sufficient evidence, and they were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Additionally, on this record, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to instruct the jury on the affirmative defense of entrapment. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Pan
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-07· cited 2×
State v. Zhang
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-07· cited 1×
State v. Granberry
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-01-15· cited 1×
State v. Plaster
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-19

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Thompkins
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
State v. Adams
Ohio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
State v. Dennis
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-09-24· cited 833×
State v. Palmer
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-12-31· cited 297×
State v. Doran
Ohio Supreme Court· 1983-06-22· cited 123×
State v. Joy
Ohio Supreme Court· 1995-12-20· cited 85×
State v. Short
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-08-11· cited 18×
State v. Irvin
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-09· cited 14×
State v. Bennett
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-14· cited 9×
State v. Gibson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-03-22· cited 9×
State v. Howard
Hamilton County Municipal Court· 1983-05-18· cited 9×
State v. Graham
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-24· cited 1×
State v. Broadus
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-01-08· cited 1×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.