Ohio Supreme Court· 6/22/1983

State v. Doran

Citations

5 Ohio St. 3d 187
449 N.E.2d 1295
5 Ohio B. 404
1983 Ohio LEXIS 744

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reasoning that entrapment constitutes an affirmative defense in part because “only the accused possesses the actual knowledge concerning his predisposition to commit the offense”
it is not unfair to require the accused to adduce evidence supporting his alleged lack of predisposition to commit the charged offenses, in support of his affirmative defense of entrapment
it is not unfair to require the accused to adduce evidence supporting his alleged lack of predisposition to commit the charged offenses, in support of his affirmative defense of entrapment
when a defendant asserts the defense of entrapment, the government is entitled to proffer evidence that the defendant is predisposed to committing the offense, including \the accused's previous involvement in criminal activity of the nature charged\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Celebrezze, Holmes, Locher, Only, Sweeney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Doran

13 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.