Skip to main content

State v. Irvin

Citations

  • 160 N.E.3d 388
  • 2020 Ohio 4847

Syllabus

Appellant was convicted of murder and tampering with evidence. Because of the murder conviction, the trial court ordered appellant to enroll in the Violent Offender Database (VOD) upon his release from prison. Requiring appellant to enroll in the VOD did not constitute cruel and unusual punishment. Appellant was not entitled to the benefit of the burden-shifting changes to Ohio's self-defense statute made by H.B. 228 (R.C. 2901.05), because the murder occurred before its effective date. Appellant's conviction was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not err by overruling appellant's motion to suppress evidence. Judgment affirmed. (Froelich, J., dissenting.)

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.