Skip to main content

State v. Graham

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 2033

Syllabus

The trial court did not commit reversible error when it barred appellant from referencing an entrapment defense prior to presenting some evidence of entrapment, and appellant did not present sufficient entrapment evidence at trial to submit the defense to the jury. Appellant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel based on counsel's failure to proffer entrapment evidence is without merit insofar as there is no basis to conclude that there was evidence of entrapment to present or proffer. Judgment affirmed. (Donovan, J., dissenting.)

Judges: Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.