United States v. Juan Gonzales and Ramsey Ramiro Muniz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the officers had reasonable suspicion based on, inter alia, the fact that the suspects “stopped to use pay phones”
• noting that officers’ statement “that the car [the defendant] was driving was suspected of being used to transport drugs . . . may have pushed the encounter, which was initially consensual, to being a Terry stop”
• noting officers’ statement “that the car [the defendant] was driving was suspected of being used to transport drugs . . . . may have pushed the encounter, which was initially consensual, to being a Terry stop”
• noting officers’ statement “that the car [the defendant] was driving was suspected of being used to transport drugs . . . . may have pushed the encounter, which was initially consensual, to being a Terry stop”
• government forfeits Fourth Amendment standing argument where defendant provides facts in district court supporting an inference of standing and government did not raise the issue
• government forfeits Fourth Amendment standing argument where defendant provides facts in district court supporting an inference of standing and government did not raise the issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).