Skip to main content

Armstrong v. State

Citations

  • 805 S.W.2d 791
  • 1991 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 59
  • 1991 WL 35880

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it would be advisory for court to address State’s additional argument where, even if argument were correct, the State would not be entitled to any relief
  • holding that question of whether a judge has complied with the requirements of the Dallas County Magistrates Act is one of law and therefore State could bring issue on appeal because appellant had also appealed pursuant to article 44.01(c)
  • explaining that, other than perhaps in the case of questions about Texas criminal law certified to this Court by a federal appellate court, the Court is “without authority to render advisory opinions”
  • stating that Texas courts “are without authority to render advisory opinions”
  • defendant was seen breaking into building, items on a desk had been moved, and papers had been shuffled
  • “This Court and the Court of Appeals are without authority to render advisory opinions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White, Clinton, Overstreet

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

69 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.