State v. Wooldridge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in absence of “true” findings, enhancement allegations did not become part of the sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wooldridge v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-03-09· cited 11×
• Wooldridge v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2010-01-07· cited 3×
• Dewayne Heath Wooldridge v. State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2009-12-17
• State of Texas v. Wooldridge, Dwayne Heath
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-03-09

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Ross
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-09-10· cited 141×
• State v. Webb
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-03-01· cited 87×
• State v. Baize
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-12-09· cited 41×
• State v. Kersh
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-02-04· cited 38×
• State v. Dickerson
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1993-10-21· cited 30×
• State v. Webb
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1998-11-05· cited 20×