Supreme Court of South Carolina· 11/13/1989
State v. Wasson
Citations
- 386 S.E.2d 255
- 299 S.C. 508
- 1989 S.C. LEXIS 194
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating burden on defendant to show not only error but resulting prejudice from jurors’ reading of trial-related newspaper article
- decision of whether or not to grant a mistrial is discretionary with trial judge and should not be disturbed absent an abuse of that discretion
- the burden on a motion for a mistrial is upon the movant to show not only error, but also resulting prejudice
- where the fact that two jurors read newspaper article discussing alleged, extraneous crimes by defendant and summarizing testimony did not entitle defendant to mistrial
- where the fact that two jurors read newspaper article discussing alleged, extraneous crimes by defendant and summarizing testimony did not entitle defendant to mistrial
- a motion for a mistrial lies within the sound discretion of the trial judge whose ruling will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion amounting to an error of law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harwell, Gregory, Chandler, Finney, Toal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-04-05· cited 157×
- State v. TuckerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-11-04· cited 105×
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-09-20· cited 92×
- State v. KellySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-06-29· cited 68×
- State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-12-09· cited 58×
- Washington v. WhitakerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-12-19· cited 49×
- State v. GrovensteinSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-06-01· cited 37×
- State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-08-09· cited 35×
- Creighton v. Coligny Plaza Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-11-30· cited 34×
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-12-21· cited 33×
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-11-25· cited 31×
- State v. BANTANCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-03-10· cited 29×
- State v. CharpingSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-10-11· cited 25×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-03-11· cited 21×
- State v. CoaxumSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-10-08· cited 16×
- State v. CameronCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1993-03-01· cited 12×
- Vestry & Church Wardens of the Church of the Holy Cross v. Orkin Exterminating Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-08-24· cited 11×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-12-06· cited 10×
- State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-04-24· cited 10×
- State v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-03-02· cited 8×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1959-06-15· cited 727×
- State v. TucknessSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-12-14· cited 45×
- State v. PrinceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-03-22· cited 26×
- State v. SaltersSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-08-09· cited 16×
- State v. StoneSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-11-03· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.