State v. Coaxum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding when there is an unintentional nondisclosure by a juror, the trial court must \consider how material the information would have been to the parties in exercising their peremptory challenges\
• finding because the jury was indisputably impartial after the juror's removal, the defendant did not meet his burden for receiving a new trial
• finding because the jury was indisputably impartial after the juror's removal, the defendant did not meet his burden for receiving a new trial
• finding when the trial court removed a juror at the State's request after an unintentional nondisclosure, the defendant had to \show a prejudicial abuse of discretion\ to receive a new trial (emphasis added)
• finding when the trial court removed a juror at the State's request after an unintentional nondisclosure, the defendant had to \show a prejudicial abuse of discretion\ to receive a new trial (emphasis added)
• party claiming unintentional concealment must prove prejudice by showing potential bias and materiality to strike decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).