Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2/2/2005
Apolinar v. State
Citations
- 155 S.W.3d 184
- 2005 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 145
- 2005 WL 236864
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the failure to request a continuance waives a complaint that the State withheld exculpatory evidence in violation of Brady
- holding that error in admitting evidence with insufficient notice under article 37.07 § 3(g) was harmless due in part to properly admitted evidence of same nature
- explaining that testimony that declarant was speaking -loudly and was, “animated” weighed in favor of determination that statement was excited utterance
- recognizing appellant = s objection was limited to hearsay and did not raise potential confrontation clause violation
- noting that statement at issue was made in response to question but that question generally asked what happened and that nothing in record suggested that answer was anything other than spontaneous
- noting basis for admitting excited utterance is assumption declarant is incapable of kind of reflection that would enable fabrication of information
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Price
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
280 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Walters v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-12-05· cited 850×
- Coble v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-10-13· cited 848×
- McCarty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-06-25· cited 243×
- Buntion v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2016-01-27· cited 191×
- Felix Sandoval v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2013-09-13· cited 166×
- Tapia, Gilbert Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2015-05-13· cited 113×
- Landers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-06-18· cited 102×
- Peavey v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2008-03-12· cited 95×
- Brown v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2006-12-14· cited 67×
- Whipple v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2009-04-22· cited 48×
- Martinez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2010-02-10· cited 48×
- Joe Louis Tienda v. StateTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2015-05-14· cited 47×
- Lane v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2005-09-15· cited 44×
- Cuadros-Fernandez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2009-08-28· cited 37×
- Hartis v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2005-12-13· cited 35×
- Nickerson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2010-05-04· cited 34×
- Mick v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2008-06-02· cited 28×
- Clark v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2009-04-01· cited 26×
- Luna v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2009-08-26· cited 25×
- Gustavo Dominguez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2013-04-18· cited 24×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Zuliani v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-02-05· cited 1,844×
- McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-09-23· cited 1,003×
- Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-06-03· cited 840×
- State v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court· 1988-06-08· cited 175×
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-01-07· cited 125×
- Apolinar v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2003-05-22· cited 94×
- People v. WashingtonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-10-03· cited 62×
- Gay v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1998-10-30· cited 50×
- Mosley v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1997-11-06· cited 43×
- Parks v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1993-02-24· cited 31×
- Vera v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1986-02-12· cited 27×
- People v. MerasAppellate Court of Illinois· 1996-05-01· cited 17×
- A.C.M. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2002-10-25· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.