Skip to main content

State v. Roy

Citations

  • 333 N.W.2d 398
  • 214 Neb. 204
  • 1983 Neb. LEXIS 1086

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing the defendant's federal and state confrontation clause claims under a single analysis
  • addressing the defendant’s federal and state confrontation clause claims under a single analysis
  • two-year-old sexual abuse victim’s answer of “daddy” made in response to emergency room nurse’s question: “Who hurt you?”, was admissible as an excited utterance exception
  • two-year-old sexual abuse victim's answer of \daddy\ made in response to emergency room nurse's question: \Who hurt you?\, was admissible as an excited utterance exception
  • “tender age” of two-year-old sex abuse victim an indicia of reliability
  • \tender age\ of two-year-old sex abuse victim an indicia of reliability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Krivosha, Boslaugh, McCown, White, Hastings, Caporale, Shanahan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.