Skip to main content

State v. Walker

Citations

  • 280 Kan. 513
  • 124 P.3d 39
  • 2005 Kan. LEXIS 850

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • despite apparently clear and unambiguous statutory language, application to the facts of the case revealed ambiguity necessitating further interpretation
  • courts presume legislature does not intend to enact useless or meaningless legislation
  • courts construe statutes to avoid unreasonable results

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Lockett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.