State v. McCurry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the state could not introduce relationship evidence when “the conduct underlying the charges did not amount to ‘domestic abuse’ under section 634.20”
• noting that Minnesota courts presume jurors follow the district court’s curative instructions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).