Court of Appeals of Kansas· 12/8/2006
State v. Cisneros
Citations
- 36 Kan. App. 2d 901
- 147 P.3d 880
- 2006 Kan. App. LEXIS 1127
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that K.S.A. 2005 Supp. 22-3716, which gave the court the authority to extend probation, is jurisdictional, and the court maintains continuing jurisdiction over a probationer only during the time the probationer is on probation and ceases at the end of the probationary period
- stating same referencing a prior version of subsection [e]
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Caplinger, Greene, Larson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mid-Continent Specialists, Inc. v. Capital Homes, L.C.Supreme Court of Kansas· 2005-02-18· cited 83×
- State v. McCurrySupreme Court of Kansas· 2005-02-18· cited 39×
- State v. GordonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2003-04-18· cited 36×
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2005-12-09· cited 23×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1994-11-18· cited 19×
- State v. GrimsleyCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1991-04-05· cited 16×
- State v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1992-01-10· cited 6×
- State v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-05-11· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.