Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1/28/2011
State v. Hoffman
Citations
- 246 P.3d 992
- 45 Kan. App. 2d 272
- 2011 Kan. App. LEXIS 12
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that if proceedings are not commenced before the expiration of the 30-day period, the district court no longer has jurisdiction over the probationer
- finding a court loses jurisdiction over a probationer when it fails to initiate proceedings within the 30-day period
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hill, P.J., Leben and Standridge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PattonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-11-14· cited 94×
- State v. HunzikerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2002-10-25· cited 69×
- State v. DexterSupreme Court of Kansas· 2003-12-19· cited 42×
- State v. GordonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2003-04-18· cited 36×
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2005-12-09· cited 23×
- State v. ElliottSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-04-28· cited 21×
- State v. BonnerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2010-03-05· cited 20×
- State v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2009-06-19· cited 19×
- State v. CisnerosCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2006-12-08· cited 16×
- State v. McCrearyCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2004-05-14· cited 5×
- State v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2004-07-23· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.