Skip to main content

State v. Walker

Citations

  • 2026 Ohio 1767

Syllabus

Motion to suppress; sufficiency of the evidence; Crim.R. 29 motion to acquit; manifest weight of the evidence; prior conviction. The trial court did not err when it denied the appellant's motion to suppress because the search of the vehicle was justified by an exception to the warrant requirement. The appellant's convictions were supported by sufficient evidence, and the trial court did not err when it denied appellant's Crim.R. 29 motion for acquittal. The appellant's convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not err by admitting stipulated certified copies of previous journal entries to establish the appellant's prior conviction.

Judges: Laster Mays

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.