Skip to main content

State v. Wagner

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 1671

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in holding that the State did not violate appellant's statutory and constitutional rights to speedy trials in two cases. For purposes of R.C. 2941.401 and R.C. 2945.71-2945.72, most of the delays that occurred between the issuance of the indictments and the disposition were not attributable to the State, and appellant did not demonstrate that he was prejudiced by the delays. Additionally, the trial court did not err in sentencing appellant by failing to make the findings required for the imposition of consecutive sentences, and the record provides no basis for vacating or modifying the sentences pursuant to R.C. 2953.08(G)(2). Judgments affirmed.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • copy at State Court Record, ECF No. 8, Ex. 28

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.