Skip to main content

State v. Hayes

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 4603

Syllabus

Appellant's speedy-trial rights were not violated. The trial court did not err by overruling appellant's motion to suppress evidence. The trial court did not err by imposing a mandatory sentence for appellant's third-degree felony possession of cocaine offense or by not merging the offense with appellant's fifth-degree felony aggravated possession of drugs offense. Appellant's claims that his drug possession convictions were not supported by sufficient evidence and were against the manifest weight of the evidence based on a purportedly unclear chain of custody for the drugs lack merit. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Hanseman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.