Skip to main content

State v. Richard

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 2980

Syllabus

Defendant-appellant's corrupting-another-with-drugs conviction is based on sufficient evidence and is not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Defendant-appellant's constitutional right a speedy trial was not violated. The trial court did not err by denying defendant-appellant's motion for severance. Defendant-appellant's sentence is not contrary to law.

Judges: Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

73 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.