Skip to main content

State v. Tucker

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 2894

Syllabus

Appellant's conviction for operating a vehicle under the influence of drugs or alcohol (OVI), with a repeat OVI offender specification, was based on sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not err in allowing a state trooper to testify that he believed appellant had been intoxicated, in allowing the State to offer a letter written by appellant to the prosecutor approximately a week before trial, and in admitting the State's exhibits related to appellant's prior OVI convictions. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Epley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.