State v. Wells

Citations

• 2022 Ohio 30

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it refused to grant a continuance to appellant or to exclude witnesses when the State inadvertently sent a witness list to another one of appellant's pending cases. All the potential witnesses were listed in discovery completed months earlier, and appellant was not prejudiced. Similarly, the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it did not classify a witness as an expert witness. Finally, because there were no errors, the doctrine of cumulative error does not apply. Judgment affirmed.