Ohio Court of Appeals· 6/14/2019

State v. Hunt

Citations

2019 Ohio 2352

Syllabus

Defendant's conviction for theft was based on sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not err in allowing a deputy to testify about defendant's statement regarding his residence. Judgment affirmed. (Froelich, J., dissenting.)

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Sutherland
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-16· cited 17×
State v. Harris
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-03· cited 15×
State v. Pate
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-05-28· cited 14×
State v. McHenry
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-10· cited 11×
State v. Dennis
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-19· cited 10×
State v. Stone
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-01-19· cited 6×
State v. Sweeney
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-09-06· cited 6×
State v. Greenlee
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-02· cited 3×
State v. Robinson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-19· cited 2×
State v. Tucker
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-08-18· cited 2×
State v. Newby
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-12· cited 2×
State v. Washington
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-29· cited 1×
State v. Armstrong
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-07-25· cited 1×
State v. Thompson-Rivers
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-11-07· cited 1×
State v. Logsdon
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-05-15

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.