Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1/26/2000
State v. Donahue
Citations
- 995 P.2d 1202
- 165 Or. App. 143
- 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 122
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “a compensatory fine may be awarded only if the trial court finds that the victim has suffered pecuniary loss as a result of the defendant’s criminal activities”
- holding that \a compensatory fine may be awarded only if the trial court finds that the victim has suffered pecuniary loss as a result of the defendant's criminal activities\
- reversing imposition of compensatory fine where victim had scheduled, but not attended or incurred costs from, psychological counseling
- vacating imposition of compensatory fine and remanding for resentencing where evidence did not establish that the victim “had incurred or would incur pecuniary harm”
- trial court erred in imposing a compensatory fine after it expressly found that there was no pecuniary loss
- “[T]he legislature has required that we remand for purposes of resentencing rather than merely vacate a portion of the sentence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmonds, Deits, Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-03-28· cited 22×
- State v. TippettsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-12-15· cited 15×
- State v. NeeseCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-06-24· cited 14×
- State v. AlonsoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-03-22· cited 12×
- State v. ONISHCHENKOCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-04-25· cited 9×
- State v. DrinkwaterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-09-23· cited 9×
- State v. GrismoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-12-21· cited 8×
- State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-12-26· cited 5×
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. S. J. P.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-01-25· cited 2×
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-08-15· cited 2×
- State v. CufaudeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-11-25· cited 2×
- State v. RiekensCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-12-18· cited 2×
- State v. HainesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-03· cited 1×
- State v. AshbaughCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-12-10· cited 1×
- State v. VillinesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-03-11· cited 1×
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-04-29· cited 1×
- State v. DotyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-02-20
- State v. FiezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-05-29
- State v. DarnellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-12-13
- State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-07-11
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. HartOregon Supreme Court· 1985-05-07· cited 53×
- State v. BarkleyOregon Supreme Court· 1993-02-19· cited 51×
- State v. EdsonOregon Supreme Court· 1999-07-29· cited 44×
- State v. GallantOregon Supreme Court· 1988-11-30· cited 44×
- State v. ForresterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-10-05· cited 5×
- State v. DonahueOregon Supreme Court· 1999-09-30· cited 1×
- State v. DonahueCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-12-17· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.