State v. Neese

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because evidence of pecuniary loss is required for the imposition of a compensatory fine, the trial court’s imposition of the * * * fine in this case was plainly erroneous and that error requires a remand of this case for resentencing * * *.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Tippetts
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-12-15· cited 15×
• State v. Harrington
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-07-08· cited 14×
• State v. ONISHCHENKO
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-04-25· cited 9×
• State v. Drinkwater
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-09-23· cited 9×
• State v. Grismore
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-12-21· cited 8×
• State v. Morgan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-09-30· cited 7×
• State v. Garlitz
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-08-23· cited 6×
• State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. S. J. P.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-01-25· cited 2×
• State v. Martino
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-09-21· cited 2×
• State v. Riekens
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-12-18· cited 2×
• State v. DEBUISER
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-04-04· cited 1×
• State v. Haines
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-03· cited 1×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-24

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 1,060×
• State v. Brown
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-09-20· cited 504×
• State v. Edson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1999-07-29· cited 44×
• State v. Donahue
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-01-26· cited 31×
• State v. Gray
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-06-24· cited 10×
• State v. Neese
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-03-04· cited 1×